Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
G. Sri Devi, J.
T. Gangadhar Rao - Appellant
Versus
State Of Telangana - Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 653 of 2020
Decided On : 29-01-2020
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 – Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406 and 420 – Criminal Trial - Criminal breach of trust and Cheating – Seeking Quash of Criminal proceedings – Held, Investigating agency to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the guidelines - Directing the police concerned to follow the procedure under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., and the guidelines - Criminal Petition is disposed of
JUDGMENT
G. Sri Devi, J. - This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.49 of 2017 on the file of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad District, registered for the offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, against the petitioner/accused.
2. Though the petitioner has raised several grounds to quash the aforesaid proceedings, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to the Investigating agency to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the guidelines prescribed by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and another, 2014 AIR(SC) 2756 .
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the directions of the Apex Court have to be followed and implemented.
4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, directing the police concerned to follow the procedure under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., and the guidelines issued by the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar s case (supra).
5. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
