SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 125

B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Pankaj Kumar Nimayat – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : H. Prahalad
For the Respondent: G. Guru Murthy, Learned Counsel

ORDER :

B. Vijaysen Reddy, J.

1. This criminal petition is filed to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 607 of 2011 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar, wherein charge sheet has been' laid against the petitioners - Accused Nos. 1 to 7 for the offences under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short 'the D.P. Act').

2. The petitioners have raised several grounds in the quash petition. However, it may not be necessary for this Court to go into the merits of those grounds since it is represented by Mr. H. Prahalad Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, that O.P. No. 380 of 2012 was jointly filed by respondent No. 2 - de facto complainant -wife, and the petitioner No. 1 - husband before the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District for mutual divorce wherein all the pending civil and criminal disputes have been settled. Learned counsel has drawn attention of this Court to clause No. 6 of the mutual divorce petition wherein it was stated that the wife shall withdraw the present criminal case i.e. C.C. No. 607 of 2011 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Red

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top