UJJAL BHUYAN
Mediciti Hospital – Appellant
Versus
D. Prasada Rao – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Mr.A.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 27.04.2021 passed by the court of Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Nampally, Hyderabad in E.A.No.1 of 2021 arising out of E.P.No.2 of 2018.
3. Dr.D.Prasada Rao, as the plaintiff, had filed O.S.No.197 of 1998 wherein Share Medical Care and the petitioner/Mediciti Hospital were arrayed as defendants. The suit was decreed by judgment and order dated 23.03.2006. Unfortunately, a copy of the judgment and order has not been annexed to the revision petition. On a query by the court, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the judgment debtor, submits that it was a money decree. From the materials on record, it is seen that the suit was decreed by directing defendant Nos.1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.29,25,657.00 together with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing the suit till the realization of the amount. Plaintiff, as the decree holder, initiated execution proceedings being E.P.No.2 of 2018. In the execution proceedings, though learned counsel for the judgment debtor No.2 was present, counter was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.