CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
Bathini Gangaram Goud, S/o B. Chinnaiah – Appellant
Versus
Md. Taher, S/o Late Md. Anwar – Respondent
ORDER :
CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, J.
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6920 of 2017
1. Questioning the validity and the legality of the order that is rendered by the Court of VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District in I.A.No.50 of 2017 in O.S.No.2081 of 2006, dated 09.08.2017, the revision petitioner, who is arrayed as respondent No.9 in the said interlocutory application, is before this Court.
2. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, i.e., the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No.1. Also, gave anxious consideration to their submission including the applicability of the decision of this Court in the case between M.Venkataratnam Reddy Vs. P.L.Manogaran and Others, 2013 (4) ALD 324.
3. By the submission of both the learned counsel what could be culminated is that a suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property is filed by respondent No.1 herein against the revision petitioner, who is shown as defendant No.9, and others.
4. Defendant No.2 and defendant No.9 i.e., revision petitioner filed a common written statement in the suit. The trial Court after framing of iss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.