SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 191

A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Megavath Sardar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5, and Sri Abu Akram, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 – Wakf Board. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in keeping the land belonging to the petitioners i.e., Acs.9.00 guntas in Survey No.280, Maheshwaram Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in the Webland Register/Prohibitory List as wakf land.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue states that if the petitioners file an application through online in Dharani Portal, the same will be considered and necessary orders will be passed by the authorities concerned, in accordance with law.

4. Having regard to the above made submission, without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitioners to make online application(s) through Dharani Portal seeking to de-notify the subject land from the Webland Register/prohibited properties list, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top