Back
K.LAKSHMAN
K. Shoba – Appellant
Versus
District Collector (Panchayat Raj Wing) Government of Telangana, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy – Respondent
ORDER :
1-a) W.P.No.22616 OF 2021 is filed by the Petitioners/Ward Members of the 2nd Respondent to quash the show cause notice No 153/2021/Pts.1 to 6, dated 06.09.2021 issued by the 1st Respondent with regard to suspension of the Petitioners and to issue consequential direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioners to continue as Ward Members till January 2024.
1-b) W.P.No.22640 of 2021 is filed by the Petitioner/Sarpanch to quash the show cause notice No.153/2021/A1/Pts.1, dated 06.09.2021 issued by the 1st Respondent with regard to removal of the Petitioner from the office of Sarpanch of the 2nd Respondent Gram Panchayat and issue consequential direction to the respondents to permit the Petitioner to continue as Sarpanch for the elected tenure.
1-c) W.P.No.22668 of 2021 is filed by the Petitioner/Upa-Sarpanch seeking to quash the show cause notice No.153/2021/A1/Pts.2, dated 06.09.2021 issued by the 1st Respondent with regard to suspension of the Petitioner from the office of Upa-Sarpanch of the 2nd Respondent Gram Panchayat and issue consequential direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue as Upa-Sarpanch of the 2nd respondent Gram Panchayat for the e
Sarpanch, aggrieved by an order of removal to be passed by the 1st Respondent under Section and 37(5) of the Act or by an intimation under Sub Section 2 of Section 35 of the Act, within 30 days from ....
Quash of show cause notices - No show cause notice before proceedings - Predetermined and conclusive decision.
Point of law: It is thus well settled that writ petition should normally not be entertained against mere issuance of show cause notice. In the present case no show cause notice was even issued when t....
Removal of a Sarpanch under Section 249 requires strict adherence to natural justice principles, including provision of enquiry reports, or risk invalidation of the order.
No confidence motion applies to a nominated officiating Sarpanch under the Panchayati Raj Act, ensuring accountability in governance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the removal of the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch was illegal and beyond the scope of Section 57(1) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the impugned notices were issued following the procedures contemplated under Section 207 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994.
If Sarapnach fails to call such meeting, the Secretary of the panchayat shall forthwith make a report thereof the competent authority and thereupon the competent authority shall call a meeting of the....
Point of Law : Upa Sarpanch – No confidence notice – Two notices - proposal of no confidence motion 2nd time against the petitioner within a period of two years from the 1st proposals and the same is....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
