M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, T.AMARNATH GOUD
S. Prashanth Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 21462 of 2019 are employees in the Institute of Preventive Medicine, Public Health Labs and Food Health Administration Department of the composite State of Andhra Pradesh, working in various capacities.
2. The composite State of Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated into the residuary State of Andhra Pradesh and the new State of Telangana w.e.f. 2.6.2014 under the Andhra Pradesh Re-Organization Act, 2014 which was enacted on 1.3.2014 by the Parliament.
3. Just prior to the commencement of the said Act on 2.6.2014, proceedings Order No. 2 in F. No. 27/13/2013/(SR)/S dated 31.5.2014 were issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions of Union of India (1st respondent) directing persons specified in the Annexure who belong to the organized State-wide Cadres in respect of Heads of Department posts in the Headquarters serving in connection with affairs of the existing State of Andhra Pradesh which, on and from 2.6.2014, forms part of the affairs of both the successor States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, to serve provisionally on and from that day in connection with the affairs of the State of
G. Rama Mohan Rao and Another vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Another
P.B. Karunakar and Others vs. State of Telangana and Others
Rani vs. Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.