K.LAKSHMAN
Represented by its Assistant Director Hyderabad Zonal Unit – Appellant
Versus
Kamma Srinivasa Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.LAKSHMAN, J.
CRIMINAL PETITION NOs.9825, 9846 AND 10021 OF 2021
The lis involved in all the three criminal petitions is the same, therefore, the same were heard together and are disposed of by the following :
ORDER:
2. The Crl.P.No.9825 of 2021 is filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (DOE) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) to quash the proceedings in SR.No.8729 of 2021, dated 18.12.2021 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 is filed by the DOE under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in SR.No.8731 of 2021, dated 18.12.2021 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad.
4. The Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner herein/Accused No.7 and respondent in Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 on bail in the event of his arrest in Enforcement Cases Information Report (ECIR) i.e.,ECIR/HYZO/22/2019 dated 23.12.2019 lodged by the DOE.
5. Vide note dated 31.12.2021, the Hon’ble Chief Justice directed the registry to list Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 along with the Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Gangula Ashok v. State of A.P.
Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
Badku Joti Savant v. State of Mysore
Illias v. Collector of Customs Madras
Manubhai Ratilal Patel v. State of Gujarat
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Narinderjit Singh Sahni v. Union of India
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in (2018) 11 SCC 1
Point of Law - For making an application in terms of section 439 of code, a person has to be in custody and section 438 of the code deals with direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arres....
Point of Law : For making an application in terms of section 439 of code, a person has to be in custody and section 438 of the code deals with direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arres....
(1) Section 88 of Cr.P.C. is in no manner inconsistent with provisions of PMLA – Section 88 will apply after filing of a complaint under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA – Order accepting bonds under Section....
An application seeking anticipatory bail is maintainable even if the petitioner is not named as an accused in the ECIR or the prosecution complaint.
The provisions of S.45 of the PMLA do not apply to anticipatory bail proceedings, allowing for bail grants based on case-specific circumstances.
The gravity of economic offences, potential influence on witnesses and evidence, and the failure to satisfy the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the PMLA were central to the court's decis....
Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Arrest of an offender during in....
The judgment establishes that in cases of money laundering under the PMLA, the conditions for granting anticipatory bail are stringent, requiring the accused to prove their innocence, and that the co....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.