IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Represented by its Assistant Director Hyderabad Zonal Unit - Petitioner
Vs.
Kamma Srinivasa Rao - Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NOs. 9825, 9846 AND 10021 OF 2021
Decided On : 15-02-2022
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 41, 41-A , 167, 438, 482 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 420, 468, 471 and 477-A - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(a) - Prevention of Money Laundering (forms and manner of arrest of person along with material to adjudicating authority and its period of registration) Rules 2005 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2005 - Section 19, 50, 65, 71 – Criminal Conspiracy - Trial of offences – Saving - Act to have overriding effect - When police may arrest without warrant - Notice of appearance before police officer – Punishment for money-laundering - Power to arrest - Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable - Punishment for vexatious search - Powers of authorities regarding summons, production of documents and to give evidence, etc - Whether authorized authorities have to comply with Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. before arresting a person under Section 19 of PMLA - Whether Designated Court can return a remand application - Whether petitioner in Crl.P. No. 10021 of 2021 is entitled for anticipatory bail.
Findings of the Court - DOE had enclosed grounds of arrest along with arrest order in Form No.III issued under Rule 6 of Rules, 2005. In grounds of arrest, details about registration of crime, issuance of summons, recording of statements, etc. are specifically mentioned - It was also stated that respondents are not cooperating in investigation - Therefore, according to DOE, considering seriousness and graveness of allegations, respondent was arrested and produced him before Designated Court along with application under Section 167 of Cr.P.C -Thus, according to DOE, authorized officer has sufficient material in his possession to believe that respondent is guilty of offences under PMLA - Section 45 of PMLA, law laid down by Supreme Court, facts of case and nature of allegations, Court could not, prima facie, satisfy itself that accused is not guilty. Therefore, anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
Result – Orders directed accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
K.LAKSHMAN, J.
CRIMINAL PETITION NOs.9825, 9846 AND 10021 OF 2021
The lis involved in all the three criminal petitions is the same, therefore, the same were heard together and are disposed of by the following :
ORDER:
2. The Crl.P.No.9825 of 2021 is filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (DOE) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) to quash the proceedings in SR.No.8729 of 2021, dated 18.12.2021 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad.
3. The Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 is filed by the DOE under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in SR.No.8731 of 2021, dated 18.12.2021 on the file of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Nampally, Hyderabad.
4. The Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 is filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner herein/Accused No.7 and respondent in Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 on bail in the event of his arrest in Enforcement Cases Information Report (ECIR) i.e.,ECIR/HYZO/22/2019 dated 23.12.2019 lodged by the DOE.
5. Vide note dated 31.12.2021, the Hon’ble Chief Justice directed the registry to list Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 along with the Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 before the Court having roster to deal with Criminal Petitions (quash) from 2018 onwards. Therefore, the Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 was heard along with the Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 and disposed of by this order.
6. Heard Sri T.Suryakaran Reddy, learned Additional Solicitor General of India representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner in Crl.P.Nos.9825 of 2021 and 9846 of 2021 and learned counsel appearing for the respondent in Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 and Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri G.Prem Kumar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent in Crl.P.No.9846 of 2021 and learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in Crl.P.No.10021 of 2021 and Sri T.Niranjan Reddy, learned senior counsel representing Sri Sujith Jaiswal, learned counsel for the respondent in Crl.P.No.9825 of 2021.
7. Facts of the case in Crl.P.No.9825 OF 2021
ii) The above said crime was registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 468, 471 and 477-A of the IPC and Section 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the PC Act’) against the respondent and others. Since the above said offences are scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the PMLA’), the DOE has initiated investigation under PMLA against the respondent and other accused by registering ECIR/HYZO/18/ 2020.
iii). The respondent/accused is the Managing Director and authorized signatory of M/s. REL. He is also a key managerial person in Madhucon Group of Companies and M/s. REL. Allegedly, the respondent/accused has fraudulently induced the banks to release loans using false documents and has generated proceeds of crime in the present case.
iv) The petitioner alleges that despite issuance of summons to appear and record his statement under Section 50 of the PMLA, the respondent had not appeared and is not cooperating with the investigation. Therefore on 17.12.2021, the DOE exercising its power under Section 19 of the PMLA, after recording the reasons to believe and informing the grounds, arrested the respondent. He was produced before the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge and his judicial custody was sought by filing an application vide SR.No.8729 of 2021 under Section 167 of Cr.P.C. On 18.12.2021.
v) The said application was returned
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Gangula Ashok v. State of A.P.
Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan
Badku Joti Savant v. State of Mysore
Illias v. Collector of Customs Madras
Manubhai Ratilal Patel v. State of Gujarat
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Narinderjit Singh Sahni v. Union of India
Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in (2018) 11 SCC 1
Point of Law - For making an application in terms of section 439 of code, a person has to be in custody and section 438 of the code deals with direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arres....
Point of Law : For making an application in terms of section 439 of code, a person has to be in custody and section 438 of the code deals with direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arres....
(1) Section 88 of Cr.P.C. is in no manner inconsistent with provisions of PMLA – Section 88 will apply after filing of a complaint under Section 44(1)(b) of PMLA – Order accepting bonds under Section....
An application seeking anticipatory bail is maintainable even if the petitioner is not named as an accused in the ECIR or the prosecution complaint.
The provisions of S.45 of the PMLA do not apply to anticipatory bail proceedings, allowing for bail grants based on case-specific circumstances.
The gravity of economic offences, potential influence on witnesses and evidence, and the failure to satisfy the twin conditions for bail under Section 45 of the PMLA were central to the court's decis....
Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Arrest of an offender during in....
The judgment establishes that in cases of money laundering under the PMLA, the conditions for granting anticipatory bail are stringent, requiring the accused to prove their innocence, and that the co....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.