SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Ramji Singh – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of Enforcement Allahabad Sub Zonal Office – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ajit Kumar Sinha Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Himanshu Hemant Gupta, Sri Aishwarya Sinha and Sri Raghav Tiberwal Advocates appearing on behalf of the applicants in Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 1611 of 2023, 1617 of 2023, 1636 of 2023, 1638 of 2023 and 1639 of 2023, Sri. Purnendu Chakravarty Advocate for the applicants in Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 1518 of 2023, 1523 of 2023 and 1602 of 2023, and Sri Rohit Tripathi Advocate, the learned counsel for the respondent -Directorate of Enforcement and perused the records.
2. All the aforesaid applications seek anticipatory bail for different accused persons in different cases, but on similar set of allegations arising out of a joint surprise check carried out on 25.03.2011 by some officers of Railways and Northern Coalfields Ltd. (NCL) at the factory premises of (1) M/s Swastik Cement Products Ltd., (2) M/s Fertico Marketing and Investments Pvt. Ltd., (3) M/s Jai Durga Industries, (4) M/s Sri Ram Fuels Pvt. Ltd. and (5) M/s Drolia Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. It was found that the aforesaid companies
Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy versus Central Bureau of Investigation
Adri Dharan Das v. State of W.B.
Nirmal Jeet Kaur v. State of M.P.
Naresh Kumar Yadav v. Ravindra Kumar
Rajendra Prasad Yadav v. State of M.P.
Rohit Tandon versus Directorate of Enforcement
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Satpal Singh v. State of Punjab
Salauddin Abdulsamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.