SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 211

T.AMARNATH GOUD
Anasuya – Appellant
Versus
Gurru Swaroopa @ Rupa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. K. Ramakrishna.
For the Respondent: Sri. N. Manohar.

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of CPC, is filed assailing the order dated 4.3.2021 passed in I.A. No. 664 of 2019 in O.S. No. 27 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Medak wherein and whereby the petition filed by the first respondent herein to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit Schedule-A and B property by metes and bounds in terms of the preliminary decree dated 6.10.2004 for allotting half share to her and half share to the plaintiff in suit A schedule property and half share to the plaintiff and remaining half share to her and other respondents in the suit Schedule-B property was allowed.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties to this Civil Revision Petition will hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in the trial court.

3. Petitioner is assignee of Decree and legal heir of defendant No. 2 in the suit. The first respondent/plaintiff filed a suit O.S. No. 27 of 2004 against the second respondent/defendant No. 1 and respondent No. 3/defendant No. 2 for partition and separate possession and for allotment of equal share to the respondent No. 1/plaintiff and respondent Nos.3/defendant No. 2 in the suit schedul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top