SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 190

K.LAKSHMAN
Vivekanand Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: N Naveen Kumar

ORDER :

Heard Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2.

2. This petition is filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.125 of 2020 of Trimulghery Police Station, Hyderabad City Commissionerate.

3. The petitioners herein are accused Nos.1 to 4 in the aforesaid crime. The offence alleged against them are under Sections - 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 506 read with 34 of IPC.

4. The allegations against the petitioners, as per the contents of the complaint, are as follows :

    i) Respondent No.2 is running an Indian Oil Petrol Bunk at Agricultural Market Yard, Bowenpally, Secunderabad;

ii) petitioner No.1 used to come to the Petrol Bunk of respondent No.2 for pouring petrol, and out of which, they had acquaintance with each other;

iii) petitioner No.1 introduced himself that he was working as a Collection Agent in Mallikarjuna Chit Fund Finance, Old Bowenpally and petitioner No.2 is a big Financier;

iv) at the request of petitioner No.1, respondent No.2 joined in the chits of Rs.10.00 lakhs, 25.00 lakhs and 50 lakhs;

v) in the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top