SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 293

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Lakshman, J.
Deeksha Educational Society, Shivarampally, National Police Academy (NPA), Ranga Reddy District, Rep by its Secretary, Smt.Padma Sheela Chandra Mohan - Appellant
Vs.
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, MAa and UD Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad - Respondent
Writ Petition No.29865 of 2021
Decided On : 25-11-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri A. Sudarshan Reddy, Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy
For the Respondent: Sri Pasham Krishna Reddy, SC FOR GHMC

Headnote:

Land - Sale deed - Possession - Originally had purchased land to an extent of Acs.7-24 guntas in Sy.No.317, situated at Budvel Village, West from one and another through a registered sale deed bearing document No.9 of 1969 dated - Thereafter had executed General Power of Attorney (GPA) vide document bearing No, dated in favour to sell said land - Pursuant to said GPA, Mr. S. Appaiah converted the said land into 102 residential plots by obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayath, and sold the plots to various individuals including the petitioner’s vendors - In said layout, petitioner’s society had also purchased 32 plots in year - Thereafter, petitioner with an intention to construct a compound wall and rooms submitted an application dated through Online - Held, In view of above discussion and on the ground that impugned punitive action of revocation of building permission was not preceded by compliance of principles of natural justice, impugned revocation letter dated is hereby set aside without considering merits and demerits of case - Said exercise shall be completed within ten (10) days from date of receipt of a copy of this order - Considering submission made by learned standing counsel for GHMC that petitioner has occupied road which leads to other plots in layout and thereby blocking the road to reach other plots, petitioner shall not make any construction pursuant to building permit dated till said exercise is completed - Present writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

ORDER :

Heard Mr. A. Sudarshan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 and Mr. Pasham Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in issuing revocation letter No.67087/GHMC/7782/2021, dated 09.09.2021 as illegal and set aside the same.

3. Originally Mr. V. Poornachander Rao had purchased the land to an extent of Acs.7-24 guntas in Sy.No.317, situated at Budvel Village, Hyderabad West from one Khaja Mir Wajid Ali and another through a registered sale deed bearing document No.9 of 1969 dated 07.01.1969. Thereafter, Mr.V.Poornachander Rao had executed General Power of Attorney (GPA) vide document bearing No.10 of 1978, dated 14.07.1978 in favour of Mr. S. Appaiah to sell the said land. Pursuant to the said GPA, Mr. S. Appaiah converted the said land into 102 residential plots by obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayath, and sold the plots to various individuals including the petitioner’s vendors. In the said layout, the petitioner’s society had also purchased 32 plots in the year 1996.

4. The petitioner’s Vendor, Mr. Abhay Raj Mathur had purchased Plot No.72, admeasuring 365 square yards from Mr. Poornachander Rao through registered sale deed bearing document No.1645 of 1978, dated 31.08.1978 and thereafter the petitioner purchased the said plot through registered sale deed bearing document No.1986 of 1996, dated 06.02.1996.

5. The petitioner made an application to the GHMC for regularization of an unapproved Lay-out in respect of Plot No.71 in Sy.No.317, Rajendranagar Circle, which is hereinafter called ‘subject property’ by paying requisite fee and accordingly, respondent authorities had issued proceedings No.LRS13032018125100, dated 13.08.2018 by regularizing the petitioner’s plot. Thereafter, the petitioner with an intention to construct a compound wall and rooms submitted an application dated 12.08.2021 through Online. Respondent No.4 after satisfying with the documents submitted by the petitioner and after receipt of the necessary charges, granted permission vide permit No.3885/GHMC/2021 in File No.67087/GHMC/7782/2021, dated 12.08.2021, but later the same was revoked vide revocation letter dated 09.09.2021 on the following grounds:

“i) As report submitted by SO, the submitted documents are not tallying with physical position. Hence proposals may be rejected.

(ii) The plot area is not tallying with the submitted ownership documents/as specified in the TS-bPASS application form.

(iii) As report submitted by SO, the submitted documents are not tallying with physical possession. Hence proposals may be rejected.”

Challenging the above, the petitioner herein filed the present writ petition.

6. Mr. A. Sudarshan Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner applied for LRS in respect of the subject plots, and the same were got regularized by the GHMC. The petitioner had applied for permission for construction on the subject plot. Before granting permission, respondent authorities having conducted spot inspection and satisfied with the documents submitted by the petitioner, granted the permission to the petitioner and, therefore, revocation of building permit is illegal and arbitrary. He would further submit that respondent NO.4 did not issue any notice and did not afford an opportunity before revoking the building permit. Therefore, it is illegal and arbitrary.

7. On the other hand, Mr. Pasham Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner has occupied the road which leads to the other plots in the Lay-Out and thereby blocking the way to other plot owners and, therefore, the GHMC has revoked the building permit.

8. Referring to LRS proceedi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top