SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, N.TUKARAMJI
Balagoni Sai Kiran S/o Veeraiah Goud – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
1. The writ appeal is arising out of an order dated 08.01.2021 passed in W.P. No. 3789 of 2019 by the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein.
2. The appellants/petitioners preferred the writ petition before the learned Single Judge stating that the appellant No. 1/petitioner No. 1 is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acs. 2.00 guntas in Sy. Nos. 692/1/1, 692/1/2, 692/1/3, 692/1/4 and 692/1/5; appellant No. 2/petitioner No. 2 is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac. 1.35 guntas in Sy. Nos. 692/3/1, 692/3/2, 692/3/3, 692/3/4 and 692/3/5; appellant No. 3/petitioner No. 3 is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac. 1.32 guntas in Sy. No. 692/2; and the appellant No. 4/petitioner No. 4 is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac. 1.10 guntas in Sy. No. 692/6, total admeasuring Acs. 6.37 guntas, situated at Duddeda Village, Kondapak Mandal, Siddipet District (erstwhile Medak District) (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject lands’). Originally, the subject lands were Government lands, which were assigned to the appellants/petitioners herein under
Dammalapati Ramalingam v. District Collector, Khammam District
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Private Limited vs. Union of India
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad through its Commissioner vs. State of Maharashtra
Swati Ferro Alloys Private Limited vs. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.