ORDER :

1. Heard Sri. M. Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri. Aadesh Varma, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. Challenging the propriety of the order dated 10.02.2020 in R.C.A. No. 23 of 2019 on the file of the Chief Judge, Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, this revision is preferred.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the revision petitioner filed R.C. No. 358 of 2013 on the file of the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad with a prayer to evict the respondents from the schedule property bearing No. 17-4-160 comprising of one mulgi, tin shed, courtyard situated at Yakutpura, Hyderabad.

4. During the enquiry, the petitioner got examined PWs. 1 and 2 and marked Exs.P-1 to P-5; whereas the respondent examined RWs. 1 to 4 and marked Exs.R-1 to R-8. The learned Rent Controller on considering the material on record, ordered eviction and to hand over the vacant possession of the premises.

5. Aggrieved thereby, the respondents preferred appeal vide R.C.A. No. 23 of 2019 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad wherein the learned Judge on appraisal of the evidence on record held that the original lease deed dated 01.07.1985/Ex.P-3