JUDGMENT:

1. Since both the appeals raise common substantial questions of law, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. S.A.No.882 of 2010 assails the judgment and decree dated 05.03.2010 in A.S.No.310 of 2006 on the file of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, whereunder the appeal was dismissed confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1497 of 1998, dated 21.04.2005 by the IX Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

3. S.A.No.114 of 2012 assails the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2011 in A.S.No.107 of 2006 on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judge (FTC), City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, whereunder the appeal was dismissed confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1498 of 1998, dated 21.04.2005 by the IX Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

4. Both the aforesaid suits were filed for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule properties and also for mesne profits and the same were dismissed.

5. The appellant in S.A.No.882 of 2010 is the plaintiff in O.S.No.1497 of 1998 and the appellant in S.A.No.114 of 2012 is the pla