SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Telangana) 362

A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
Khaja Azeemuddin – Appellant
Versus
Fahmina Begum – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mohammad Adnan

ORDER :

1. The revision petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 16.03.2021 in IA No.170 of 2021 in OP No.166 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Family Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder the learned Judge, has dismissed the application filed under Rule-32 of Civil Rules of Practice by the petitioner seeking permission for representation by his Special Power of Attorney (SPA) holder.

2. The petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that the SPA is subsisting and the petitioner has given SPA in his favour to represent the petitioner in OP No.166 of 2015 and accordingly, the application was filed under Rule-32 of Civil Rules of Practice. This application was dismissed by the Court below with an observation that till date the original petitioner has not submitted the affidavit as required under Rule 33 of Civil Rules of Practice, though the other party has taken serious objection of the said aspect. Only because the original petitioner is staying away from the jurisdiction of this Court, that does not mean that he can submit his affidavit at a later point. If at all, the original petitioner i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top