UJJAL BHUYAN, P.MADHAVI DEVI
S. V. Developers – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
This order will dispose of W.P. Nos. 23067 of 2019, 27138 of 2019 and 22195 of 2021.
1. We have heard Sri M. Laxmi Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Smt. Ch. Vedavathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Maruthi Jadhav, learned counsel appearing for Pearl Law Associates for the respondents.
2. In W.P. No. 23067 of 2019 the prayer made is to set-aside the notice dated 08.01.2018 issued by the respondent State Bank of India (SBI) under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (briefly ‘the SARFAESI Act’ hereinafter). Petitioner in W.P. No. 27138 of 2019 has sought for quashing of letter dated 22.11.2019 issued by the respondent/SBI stating that petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of one time settlement (OTS) scheme and further seeks a direction to the respondent/SBI to grant the benefit of OTS scheme to the petitioner in terms of the Circular of SBI dated 13.08.2019.
3. In the later Writ Petition i.e. W.P. No. 22195 of 2021 the prayer made is for a declaration that respondent No. 1 i.e. Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Hyderabad would not have the jurisdiction
Bhaskar Laxman Jadhav vs. Karamveer Kakasaheb Wagh Education Society
Md. Frozen Foods Exports Private Limited vs. Hero Fincorp Limited
Maharashtra Tubes Limited vs. State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra Limited
Mathew Varghese vs. M. Amritha Kumar
Prestige Lights Limited vs. State Bank of India
Ramjas Foundation vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.