SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 332

G. RADHA RANI
Chinthapally Shashidhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.S. P. Suresh Kumar.

ORDER :

1. This petition is filed by the petitioner-A1 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in CC No.488 of 2013 on the file of XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, L.B. Nagar, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief was that on 10.01.2012 at 11.00 AM, the 2nd respondent lodged a report before the Police, L.B. Nagar Police Station, stating that he was working as a Junior Investigator in the Indian Music Industry (IMI) and the said IMI was having membership of 140 leading music companies. The main object of the IMI was to protect the interest of their member companies from Audio chip piracy. He was given General Power Attorney to conduct survey and to detect audio piracy and to give complaints in the police station for taking necessary action. On 10.01.2012 he conducted survey in the limits of L.B. Nagar Police Station of Cyberabad Commissionerate with the assistance of LWs.2 to 4 and found some of the Mobile Shop owners were indulging in audio chip piracy and named the shops as Sai Sri Communications, Nagole X road, LB Nagar; Sri Laxmi Rasasgnya Mobiles, Nagole X Road, Bandlaguda road; Manikanta Mobiles, Nagole X road, Bandlaguda; Sri Laxmi Communications,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top