ORDER :

Heard Sri Raghava, Advocate, who argued on behalf of Sri D. Naresh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused. Also heard the submission of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, who is representing respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. Challenge in this Criminal Revision Case is the order that is rendered by the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sanga Reddy, in Crl.M.P.No.1089 of 2018 in C.C.No.213 of 2016, dated 15.09.2021.

3. An application vide Crl.M.P.No.1089 of 2018 was filed by the petitioner herein, who is Accused in C.C.No.213 of 2016, seeking to receive certain documents. The said application stood dismissed vide order dated 15.09.2021. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/Accused is before this Court.

4. When the impugned order dated 15.09.2021 is looked into, it is found that the trial Court dismissed the said application making an observation that the case is at the stage of cross-examination of PWs.1 and 2 and the petitioner/Accused would be at liberty to file the documents he relies upon at appropriate stage during the course of trial. By observing thus, the said application was dismissed. However, in the impugned order, the Court at the conc