SUREPALLI NANDA
G. Rajamouli – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Smt. K. Udaya Sri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Usha Kiran, learned counsel representing the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents’ corporation.
2. The petitioner filed this writ petition to issue an order, direction or writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in retiring the petitioner from service on 28.02.2013 vide proceedings/notification No. 1/693(10)/2012-KRZ, dated 05.09.2012 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Clause 19(1) of APSRTC Employees (Service) Regulations,1964 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till February, 2013 in service while treating the date of birth of the petitioner as 04.02.1959.
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
(b) The petitioner applied for the post of Conductor and selected for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.