SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 65

SUREPALLI NANDA
K. Yadagiri – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr S.Rahul Reddy
For the Respondents: Mr D.Balakishan Rao

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. This Writ is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not notifying the vacancy meant for the post of disabled persons under 3% quota for the post of Veterinary Assistant in Category (4) of Class-A in Medak District under Notification No.30/2017 dated 02.06.2017 in 1st Respondent Department, and further not indicating the backlog vacancies from the earlier recruitment and roster point as illegal, without jurisdiction, violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider and appoint the Petitioner against the vacancy meant for disabled persons under 3% quota or any other unfilled backlog vacancies as per Rule 22 of Telangana State and Subordinate Service Rules 1996 for the post of Veterinary Assistant in Category (4) of Class-A in Medal District under Notification No.30/2017 dated 02.06.2017, as per eligibility and merit with all consequential reliefs.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

a) The Petitioner, belongs to BC(A) Community and is Orthopaedically handicapped and possesses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top