SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 295

M. G. PRIYADARSINI
S. Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
V. Nageshwar Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : JAGATHPAL REDDY KASI REDDY
For the Respondent: KOTA SUBBA RAO

JUDGMENT :

By order, dated 07.04.2014, the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional chief Judge, City Civil Courts at Hyderabad (for short, ‘the tribunal’) partly allowed O.P.No.2887 of 2011 awarding total compensation of Rs.19,02,140/- in favour of the claimant towards compensation. Seeking enhancement of compensation, the claimant preferred MACMA No. 4015 of 2014 and challenging the quantum of compensation as excessive, the Insurance Company-M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, respondent No. 2 before the tribunal, preferred MACMA No. 4277 of 2015.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties have been referred to as arrayed before the Tribunal.

3. The claimant filed a petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act claiming compensation of Rs.30,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 01.12.2011. It is stated that on 01.12.2011, at about 13:45 hours, while the claimant was proceeding on his motorcycle towards Hi-tech city and when he reached the railway station flyover of high-tech c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top