SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 447

K. SURENDER
Rafeeq Akbani – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P. Shashi Kiran.
For the Respondents: Pramod Kumar Kedia.

ORDER :

1. Criminal Petition No. 1690 of 2018 is filed by A1 and Criminal Petition No. 1689 of 2018 is filed by A2 and A3 for quashing the proceedings against them in Crime No. 109 of 2017 pending investigation before the CCS, Hyderabad.

2. The defacto complainant approached the Commissioner of Police, CCS and filed written complaint on 21.07.2017 which was registered for the offence under Sections 420 and 406 r/w 34 of IPC. It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioners approached the defacto complainant for purchase of refined edible oils. Petitioners promised to pay cost of the supplied material within 15 days from the date of supply and also assured interest at the rate of 24% per annum if the payment goes beyond the promised date. Believing the representation and assurance given by the petitioners, from 20.12.2014 to 06.02.2015 against 9 invoices, oil was supplied. Prior to the said transactions initially amounts were paid within time from the date of purchase and thereafter started making payments belatedly and callously. Thereafter, the petitioners denied to payment of major amounts. On verification of the accounts, the total outstanding was Rs. 1,00,24,069/-. For not pay

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top