SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Cal) 534

BIBHAS RANJAN DE
Rakesh Setia – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sabyasachi banerjee, Adv., Mr. Avik Ghatak, Adv., Mr. Rudrajit Sarkar, Adv., Mr. Aditya Kanodia, Adv., Ms. Garima Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Tamoghna Saha, Adv., Mr. Fahad Imam, Adv., Mr. Abinash Pradhan, Adv., Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Adv., Mr. Soumya Nag, Adv., Mr. Rudrajit Sarkar, Adv., Mr. Aditya Kanodia, Adv., Ms. Garima Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Tamoghna Saha, Adv., Mr. Fahad Imam, Adv., Mr. Abinash Pradhan, Adv.,
For the Respondent: Mr. Rudradipta Nanady, Adv., Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Adv., Mr. Asraf Mondal, Adv Mr. Nirupam Dhali, Adv., Mr. Rudradipta Nanady, Adv., Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Adv., Mr. Nirupam Dhali, Adv., Mr. Suresh Kumar Shani, Adv., Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Arun Kumar Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Ajay Choubey, Adv., Mr. Kaustav Das, Adv.,

Table of Content
1. identical facts and issues in both crr applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allegations involve civil nature despite criminal charges. (Para 4 , 58)
3. emphasis on initial intent required for cheating. (Para 19 , 60)
4. court unable to find evidence of fraud or dishonesty. (Para 66 , 68)

JUDGMENT :

Bibhas Ranjan De, J.

1. Both the CRR application numbers being CRR 12 of 2024 & CRR 14 of 2024 having identical facts and contentious issues are hereby decided via this common judgment.

2. This case was put into motion by a written complaint made by the opposite party no. 2 herein/complainant on 22.06.2023 with the officer in-charge of the Hare Street Police Station which gave rise to the instant case in the year 2023 being Hare Street Police Station Case no. 224 of 2023 dated 01.08.2023 under Sections 406 /420/120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short IPC) corresponding to G.R. (S) 874 of 2023 presently pending before the Court of Ld. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta.

3. In the written complaint the opposite party no. 2 herein ( in connection with CRR 12 of 2024 & CRR 14 of 2024 respectively) alleged inter alia that the accused persons namely Faizaan Pasa, Nabil Patel, I.A. Sh

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                          whatsapp-icon Back to top