SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 46

K. SURENDER
Nagabandi Baby Nageswaramma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P. Giri Krishna.
For the Respondent: Sridhar Chikyala.

JUDGMENT :

K. SURENDER, J.

1. The appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and one year respectively vide judgment in C.C. No. 54 of 2004 dated 31.03.2008 passed by the Principal Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. Briefly, the case of defacto complainant is that her property situated at Kamaypally village was given on rent to B.C Welfare Office, Khammam for running hostel in it. The rent was fixed at Rs. 1,073/- per month. Later, on an application made, the rent was enhanced to Rs. 1,575/- per month. The rent was being paid through Demand Draft. For the months of May, June and July, 2003, the rent was due. PW-1 met the appellant and asked to pay three months rent. Then the appellant demanded bribe of Rs. 500/- on 10.11.2003 for handing over the Demand Draft that was issued on 08.10.2003. The demand was repeated on 11.10.2003, 14.10.2003 and 20.10.2003. On the said three days, the husband of PW-1 met the appellant.

3. On 23.10.2003, PW-1 and her husband went to the ACB office and gave Ex.P1 written complaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top