ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of respondents 1 to 3 in treating the woman reservation as the vertical reservation instead of treating it as horizontal reservation and selecting and appointing 4th respondent, who is less meritorious candidate than the petitioner, for the post of Programmer Trainee, E-1 Grade (Internal) (for short ‘Programmer Trainee’), pursuant to the notification issued in Circular Ref. No.CRP/PER/R/2023/240, dated 01.03.2023, for selection of the posts through Internal Candidates, insofar as the Programmer Trainee, is concerned, under the guise of implementing the 33.33% of Women Reservation, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the Dicta laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajesh Kumar Daria v. Rajastan Public Service Commission and others, AIR 2007 SC 3127, Public Service Commission, Uttaranchal v. Mamta Bisht and others, 2010 (12) SCC 204, K. Venkatesh and another v. Government of AP and others, 2009 (6) ALT 483 and consequently to read down the Notification dated 01.03.2023 insofar as 33.33% of women reservation is concerned, set aside the 100 point roster in