Back
G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
M. Radha Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Petition is filed to quash all further proceedings in Crime.No.86 of 2014 dtd. 28/1/2014 on the file of Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad.
2. The petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.86 of 2014 for the offence punishable under Sec. 338 of IPC. Basing on the complaint of the 2nd respondent, the Police have registered a case against the petitioners. The petitioners are Doctors by profession.
3. It is the case of the prosecution that the wife of the 2nd respondent aged about 36 years was suffering with 'hesterectomy' and 'hernia' and he consulted their family Doctors i.e., Dr.M.Srihari Rao and Dr.M.Radhika Rani i.e., petitioner Nos.1 and 2. On 20/5/2013, the 2nd respondent admitted his wife in Raghava Multi Specialty Hospital and got operated on 21/5/2013. In the middle of the operation, they arranged drain pipe but it fell down after few minutes. Though they tried to arrange it again, it could not be fixed and then their staff started pressing his wife's stomach, which got burst at operation place. Doctors requested the 2nd respondent not to complain about the same to any one and that they will cure the same. Immediately, th
The court emphasized the requirement of gross negligence and high recklessness to fasten criminal liability on doctors.
Criminal liability for medical negligence requires a higher degree of negligence than civil cases, necessitating proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Medical professionals cannot be prosecuted for negligence unless there is gross negligence established through expert opinion; mere errors or lack of consent do not suffice.
Criminal prosecution for medical negligence requires evidence of gross negligence, not merely attendance during emergencies, and must be substantiated with expert testimony.
For criminal liability under Section 304-A IPC in cases of medical negligence, there must be gross negligence proven by credible medical evidence; mere allegations without such evidence are insuffici....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of 'gross negligence' to establish an offence under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code in cases of medical malpractice.
Competent medical opinion is necessary in cases of medical negligence, and the court emphasized the need for care and caution in the interest of society when prosecuting doctors for offenses of crimi....
Medical negligence requires substantial expert evidence to warrant prosecution; mere allegations without solid proof are insufficient.
Medical negligence accusations must be substantiated by clear evidence; mere allegations, without expert consensus on negligence, are insufficient for criminal liability.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
