SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 708

SUREPALLI NANDA
Dondeti Marreddy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.Ravindra, Advocate, K.Arvind Kumar, Advocate, Venugopal Julakanti, Advocate

JUDGMENT

SUREPALLI NANDA,J. - Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned Central Government counsel appearing for the 1st and 3rd respondents, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the 4th and 5th respondents, and also the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 6th and 7th respondents.

2. This writ petition is filed to issue a writ, order, orders or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 as arbitrary and illegal and direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to impound the passports of respondent Nos.6 and 7 vide passport No.K079406 and Z2887031.

3. The case of the Petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

a) The Petitioner's daughter Anusha Reddy got married with the 6th respondent on 30/12/2011 as per Rights and Customs prevailing in Christian Community. At the time of marriage, as per demand of respondent Nos.6 and 7 and their parents, the petitioner gave 100 tolas of gold and diamond Jewellery, registered Ac.17.00 of land at Sadasivapet, Medak District and 666 Syds of open plot at Hi-Tech city, Madhapur.

b) After the marriage, respondent Nos.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top