SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 573

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J.
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-15312-2020
Decided On : 01-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sudhir Nar, Sr. Panel Counsel, for the Respondent. Mr. Sandeep, Addl. Ag, Punjab

The impounding of a passport must be done in accordance with just and fair procedures, and the exercise of power by Passport Authorities must adhere to the Principles of Natural Justice and statutory provisions of the Passport Act.

Headnote:

Passport - Impounding of Passport - Passport Act, 1967, Section 10(3)(c), Section 12(1)(b) - The court discussed the issuance of a Show Cause Notice seeking explanation for suppressing material facts in the Passport Application, the arbitrary impounding of the passport without a lawful order, and the violation of Principles of Natural Justice and statutory provisions of the Passport Act. The court quashed the Show Cause Notice and the order, directing the Passport Authorities to return the passport of the petitioner within three weeks.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's passport was confiscated upon his return to India, based on a Show Cause Notice issued earlier regarding the suppression of material facts in his Passport Application. The petitioner challenged the impounding of his passport, citing the lack of a lawful order for impoundment and the violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that no order for impounding the passport had been passed by any authority, and the exercise of power by the Passport Authorities was arbitrary and oppressive. The court also noted the violation of Principles of Natural Justice and statutory provisions of the Passport Act.

Issues: The issues revolved around the arbitrary impounding of the passport without a lawful order, the violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and the statutory provisions of the Passport Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the impounding of the passport without a lawful order and without considering the petitioner's reply or hearing him amounted to a violation of Principles of Natural Justice and wrongful exercise of powers. The court also emphasized the need for actions to be taken strictly in accordance with the law.

Final Decision: The court quashed the Show Cause Notice and the order, directing the Passport Authorities to return the passport of the petitioner within a period of three weeks. The court granted liberty to the Regional Passport Authority to proceed strictly in accordance with the law if a fresh Show Cause Notice is deemed necessary.

JUDGMENT

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. (Oral) - The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the impugned order dated 28.10.2019 (Annexure P-14) passed by respondent No.2-Joint Secretary (PSP) & Chief Passport Officer, New Delhi vide which respondent No.2 denied to adjudicate the appeal of the petitioner which was filed by him challenging the impounding of his passport with a further prayer seeking direction to respondent No.3-Regional Passport Officer, Chandigarh to release the passport of the petitioner which was seized on 01.12.2017 vide Seizure Memo (Annexure P-5) and was sent to the Regional Passport Officer, Chandigarh or to issue a fresh passport.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner was holding a valid passport and vide Annexure P-1 dated 10.10.2017, he was issued Show Cause Notice by respondent No.3-Regional Passport Authority, Chandigarh seeking clarifications regarding issuance of passport facilities to him. By way of the aforesaid Show Cause Notice, he was called upon to provide a suitable explanation and submit a fresh application with correct details regarding the circumstances under which he had suppressed the material information in his Passport Application and obtained the aforesaid passport. The said Show Cause Notice was issued due to the reason that in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India and also friendly relations of India with any foreign country and also to state as to why action should not be taken to impound the passport No.N6507248 dated 07.01.2016, under Section 10(3)(c) 'In the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India and also the security of India' the contents of the aforesaid Show Cause Notice vide Annexure P-1 are reproduced as under:-

    'To,

    HARPAL SINGH

    S/O HARJINDER SINGH VILL. LOHARI

    KALAN TEH-BASSI PATHANA, FATEHGARH SAHIB, PUNJAB, INDIA, PINCODE -140412, TEL NO.-

    Subject: Clarifications required regarding issuance of Passport facilities to Shri/Smt./Kumari/Master HARPAL SINGH

    Dear Applicant,

    This is in reference to receipt of an adverse Police Verification report corresponding to your application for Passport issue, with file number CH2068702391815, dated 07/01/2016.

    You are therefore, called upon to provide a suitable explanation and submit a fresh application with correct details. Please note that you are required to furnish a proper explanation regarding the circumstances under which you had suppressed the material information in your passport application and obtained the above said passport.

    This Show Cause Notice is issued to you due to the reason mention below:-

    In the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country.

    Also state why action should not be taken to impound the passport number N6507248 dated 07/01/2016, under Section 10(3)(c), 'In the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of India, friendly relations of India with any foreign country' of the Passport Act, 1967 and Section 12(1)(b) of the Passport Act, 1967 should not be initiated against you.

    Please quote the reference number mentioned in the top block of this letter for further correspondence.

    Yours Sincerely"

    3. Thereafter, as per the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner being an Officer of the Court/Advocate at District Court, Fatehgarh Sahib and also a Human Rights Activist, was to attend a conference at Bangkok, Thailand which was to be conducted by the United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the responsibility to protect along with other International Organizations and the invitation was issued to the petitioner by the United Nations Organization dated 01.11.2017 vide Annexure P-4. The said invitation was extended to the petitioner by Under-Secretary-General, Special Adviser of the Secretary-General on Prev

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top