JUDGMENT

1. These two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals have been filed by the respondents/defendants in O.S.No.1366 of 2018 on the file of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy. They have filed these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals against the Order passed by the trial Court in two different interlocutory applications in the same suit. C.M.A.No.493 of 2022 has been filed against the orders of the trial Court in I.A.No.1104 of 2018 and C.M.A.No.497 of 2022 has been filed against the order in I.A.No.1103 of 2018. In fact, the Court below disposed both the interlocutory applications by way of a common order dtd. 18/6/2021. As could be seen from the orders in the above referred interlocutory applications, the trial Court allowed the applications filed by the respondents/plaintiffs and restrained respondents/defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff and also restraining the respondents/defendants from changing the nature of the suit schedule property. Being aggrieved by the above said common order, the petitioners who are respondent Nos.16 to 18 in the above petition filed these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, but on the same grounds. S