SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 673

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
P. Raghuveer – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The land, which is the subject matter of these three Writ Petitions, is one and the same and as such, all these three matters were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Writ Petition No.22742 of 2013 was filed questioning the orders passed by respondent No.2 in proceedings No.P3/617/2010, dtd. 17/6/2013, purported to be in exercise of the revisional power under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act, 1923').

3. Writ Petition No.5405 of 2014 was filed questioning the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 therein in conducting the re-survey of the subject land and attempting to dispossess the petitioner.

4. Writ Petition No.3014 of 2017 was filed aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent-Police in not providing Police Protection for implementation of the orders passed in O.S.No.59 of 1968, O.S.No.1788 of 2010 and certain other orders passed by this Court.

5. The brief and undisputed facts that are relevant for disposal of these Writ Petitions are as under:- The father of the petitioner originally filed O.S.No.31 of 1965, which was renumbered as O.S.No.59 of 1968 on the file of the Court of the Munsi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top