Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. Sarath, J
Gunda Saralamma died per LR Gunda Chandrasekhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary for Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim occupancy rights (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. respondents assert fraud (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court considers submissions (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 4. writ petitions dismissed (Para 33 , 34) |
ORDER:
As both these writ petitions are filed challenging the order passed by the respondent No.2-Joint Collector-II, Ranga Reddy District in Case No.D1/5951/2008 dated 12.12.2014, they are being disposed of by this common order.
3. For the purpose of narrating the facts, W.P.No.24536 of 2015 is taken as a lead case.
5. Learned Counsel for the petitioners further submits that the paternal grandfather of petitioner, by name Gunda Veeranna, was in possession and enjoyment of the said lands as protected tenant during his lifetime and after his demise, his two sons namely Gunda Chandrappa and Gunda Eshwarappa have succeeded the said lands and the Inams Tribunal has granted Occupancy Rights Certificates in their favour in the year 1975-76 and their names were entered in the revenue records as pattadars of the above said lands as per their shares since 1978 onwards. He submits that in the s
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
The court emphasized the necessity of following due process and issuing notice to affected parties in revenue record alterations, affirming the principles of natural justice.
The exercise of revisional power under the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act after a significant delay is improper and violates principles of natural justice.
The court ruled that delayed administrative actions undermining property rights must be resolved through civil courts, emphasizing the importance of timely legal recourse.
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
Petitioners cannot seek restoration of land title based on an unregistered agreement; proper legal procedures must be followed for title validation, and corrections made in revenue records are upheld....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
