M. G. PRIYADARSINI
Cheemarla Venkataiah – Appellant
Versus
Yahya Bahamed – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Aggrieved by the docket order dated 29.02.2024 in O.S.No. 81 of 2022 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy (hereinafter will be referred as ‘Trial Court’), the defendants have preferred the present Civil Revision Petition to set aside the impugned order.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the Trial Court.
3. The brief facts of the case, which necessitated the revision petitioners to file the present revision, are that the plaintiffs have filed a suit for specific performance of agreement of sale, dated 14.05.2008 against the defendants. During the course of trial, the plaintiff got examined as PW1 and got marked Exs.A1 to A7. While marking a document i.e., declaration cum receipt, the counsel for the defendants have raised an objection that the said declaration cum receipt cannot be marked as it requires stamp duty and penalty to that effect and that the plaintiffs have created the said document. The trial Court has passed the impugned docket order dated 29.02.2024 marking the said document as Ex.A8 on behalf of plaintiffs. Aggrieved by the same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.