Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
P. Vijay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Smt. D.Padmavathi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri V.Narasimha Goud, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 4.
PRAYER:
2. The Petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
3. PERUSED THE RECORD:
Point of Law : Wherever there is no specific evidence that assignments of lands were made subsequent to the issuance of G.O.Ms., benefit of doubt should be extended in favour of the parties who inten....
Prohibition for assignment of these lands under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 is not attracted to the said land since the alienations were made by the ex-servicemen more....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
