IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Surepalli Nanda, J.
RTC Telangana Mazdoor Union & others - Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Telangana & others - Respondents
W.P.No.38731 OF 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2024
Trade Union - Writ Petition - Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 8, 28 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Trade Unions Act, emphasizing the authority of the Registrar and the necessity of civil court intervention in intra-union disputes, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, representing a trade union, challenged an order by the Registrar that recognized a rival group as the elected body of the union, despite internal disputes and resignations of key members.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Registrar lacked authority to resolve intra-union disputes and that the proper remedy was to approach the civil court, as per previous court directives.
Issues: Whether the Registrar had the authority to determine the elected body of the trade union amidst internal disputes and whether the writ petition was maintainable given the existence of an alternate remedy.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in cases of disputed facts and internal union conflicts, the appropriate course is to seek resolution through civil courts rather than through writ jurisdiction.
Result: The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the aggrieved party to approach the civil court.
ORDER :
Heard Mr.V.Murali Manohar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for labour appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, 17 and 19, Mr.V. Narasimha Goud, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.6, 7, 13 and 15, Mr. N.Praveen Kumar, learned standing counsel for TSRTC appearing on behalf of respondent No.18.
2. The Petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under :
PERUSED THE RECORD
3. This Court passed Interim order dated 18.10.2022 in W.P.No.38731 of 2022, reads as under:
Personal notice is permitted
Status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained till the next date of hearing.”
Post on 01.11.2022
4. The said interim order had been extended pending further orders vide order of this Court, dated 28.02.2023 passed in I.A.No.03 of 2023 in W.P.No.38731 of 2022 and the same are in force as on date.
5. A memo has been filed on behalf of petitioner No.4, who had filed present writ petition representing the petitioner No.1/RTC Telangana Mazdoor Union in the capacity of General Secretary and the contention of the said memo filed in the month of January, 2023, reads as under:
In the above circumstance, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to close the writ petition No. 38731 of 2022 as so far as Mr. A. Ramachandra Reddy is concerned, who is petitioner No. 4 and also representing the petitioner No. 1 Union and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
6. The case of the Petitioners as per the averments made by the petitioners in the affidavit filed by the petitioners in support of the present Writ Petition, in brief, are as follows:
(b) Thereafter, the Respondent Nos. 6, 7, 12, 13 and 14 have submitted their resignation due to internal disputes in the 1st Petitioner Union. However, the said respondents began to misrepresent that they were designated office-bearers of the Petitioner union by printing letter heads of the 1st Petitioner union with their names, despite having submitted their resignations on 28.09.2020. On 21.11.2020 the 2nd Petitioner, issued a public notice representing the 1st Petitioner union, on the letter-head of the 1st Petitioner union bringing to the notice of the general public about the illegal activities of a few former office-bearers
M/s. Radhakrishnan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks reported in (1998) 8 SCC 1
Magadh Sugar and Energy Limited Vs. State of Bihar and Others
The court established that the Registrar of Trade Unions cannot resolve internal disputes of a union and that aggrieved parties must seek civil court remedies.
Point of law: Election dispute which is sought to be resolved, the Division Bench was of the view that, the election dispute in a trade union need not be interfered with by the writ Court.
The Registrar of Trade Unions cannot withdraw previously issued administrative decisions once acted upon without clear statutory authority, especially when such actions violate principles of natural ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.