JUDGMENT :

M.G. Priyadarsini, J.

Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2021 in O.S.No.74 of 2018 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned III Additional District and Judge (FTC-II) at Khammam (hereinafter will be referred as ‘trial Court’), the plaintiff preferred the present appeal to set aside the impugned judgment.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The brief facts of the case, which necessitated the appellant to file the present appeal, are as follows :

(a) The sole plaintiff filed O.S.No.74 of 2018 against the sole defendant for declaration and delivery of possession in respect of suit schedule property. The brief averments of the plaint are as under:

(i) The plaintiff is the owner of suit schedule lands. The defendant is the wife of plaintiff’s elder brother. As the plaintiff is residing at Hyderabad along with her husband and two daughters for their children’s education, the defendant entered her name in revenue pahanies in respect of suit schedule lands illegally with the help of forged documents. The plaintiff never executed any kind of document in fa