ALOK ARADHE, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commercial Tax Officer, Hyderabad – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Mr. K.P. Amarnath Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned Additional Solicitor General of India representing Mr. Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for respondent No. 3.
2. This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
(a) calling for the records on the file of the 1st Respondent relating to the assessment order dated 15.10.2012 for the period 2006-07 under APVAT Act, 2005 and quash the order of assessment dated 15.10.2012, as passed without proper authorization from the Deputy Commissioner.
(b) to declare that the transactions fall under Section 65(105)(zzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 and that the Petitioner is not liable to pay VAT under Section 4(8) of the APVAT Act on this turnover.
(c) to declare Section 4(8) of the APVAT Act as travelling beyond Entry 54 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India in so far as it seeks to levy tax on a service transaction without identifying the value of sale involved.
(d) in the alternative if the transactions en
Aggarwal Brothers v. State of Haryana
Ad Age Outdoor Advertising Private Limited vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Direct Recruit Class II Engineering Officers' Association v. State of Maharashtra
Greater Eastern Shipping Company Limited v. State of Karnataka
M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka
S. Nagaraj (dead) by LRs. v. B.R. Vasudeva Murthy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.