Back
T. MADHAVI DEVI
Vandana Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, HMWSSB, HYD, – Respondent
ORDER :
(T. Madhavi Devi, J.) :
In this Writ Petition (TR), the petitioner is seeking a direction to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing No.2105/E3/2005/3114 dt.09.08.2007 and Memo No.2105/3/ 2005/3507 dt.02.08.2008 and to set aside the same by declaring the same as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and to pass such other order or orders.
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition (TR) are that the petitioner was working as an Assistant (F&A) in O&M Division 2. She was deputed to work in e-Seva Centre at Malakpet as Operator during the period from September, 2001 till July 2002, as Manager at Vanasthalipuram e-Seva from August, 2002 to February, 2003 and again as Manager at Malakpet e-Seva from 10.02.2003. She was served with a charge sheet dt.09.12.2004 by the 4th respondent framing the following charge:
In response to the said charge sheet, the petitioner sub
Disciplinary authorities must conduct independent inquiries and cannot rely solely on external recommendations; failure to do so renders the proceedings invalid.
Disciplinary authorities must act independently and not under external influence when imposing punishments.
The appellate authority must issue a reasoned order in disciplinary proceedings; failure to do so renders the order invalid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
