Back
K. SUJANA
Machani Kiran – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
K. Sujana, J.
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in Cr.No.09 of 2023 of Genome Valley Police Station, Cyberabad. The offences registered against the petitioners are under Sections 467, 468 and 420 of Indian Penal Code (for short the ‘I.P.C’).
2. The case of the prosecution is that one Parvathipuram Nagaiah, owned Ac.2.00 guntas of land in Sy.No.311, later Machani Madhusudhan (petitioner No.2/A.2) had purchased Ac.0.20 guntas of land from Nagaiah in Sy.No.311/A through a registered document bearing No.9929 of 2023 on 15.11.2003 and he sold entire Ac.0.20 guntas of land to M. Govardhan Reddy and M. Pulla Reddy vide registered document bearing No.7252 of 2024 on 09.07.2004. In the year 2021, M. Goverdhan Reddy sold his half share of land i.e., Ac.0.10 guntas to Samarth Gupta through sale deed dated 25.06.2021. That Mr. R. Rajaratnam has got Special Power of Attorney on 07.07.2021 from Samarth Gupta to an extent of Ac.0.10 guntas which was later registered in the name of his brother R. Sree Ramkumar i.e., the 2nd respondent/de facto compl
Allegations of forgery and cheating under IPC Sections 467, 468, and 420 were not substantiated, necessitating resolution of boundary disputes in civil court.
Serious allegations in criminal cases require a trial, while vague claims against some petitioners may lead to quashing of proceedings.
Criminal proceedings cannot be used to settle civil disputes when the civil court has already made decisions on the matter.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
