Back
P. SAM KOSHY, N. TUKARAMJI
Attapur Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. SAM KOSHY, J.
1. The instant is an appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. filed by the appellant-accused challenging the judgment of conviction dated 28.04.2016 in Sessions Case No. 245 of 2015 passed by the Judge, XVI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
2. Heard Mr. Mettu Govardhan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
3. Vide the impugned judgment, the Trial Court had found the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and upon convicting the appellant, sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four (04) months.
4. The case of the prosecution, as per the charge-sheet, is that on 29.01.2014 at 00:30 hours, PW-1 (R. Anil Kumar) who is father of the Master R. Yashraj Kumar (hereinafter, the ‘deceased’) lodged a initial complaint at Mangalhat Police Station, Hyderabad, contending that the deceased was missing since 28.01.2014 who went out from the house for playing a
The conviction for murder was upheld based on strong circumstantial evidence and the 'last seen together' doctrine, establishing the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Circumstantial evidence and the last seen theory can establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt when the accused fails to provide a satisfactory explanation.
The conviction under Section 302 IPC was upheld based on circumstantial evidence, particularly the last seen theory, and the appellant's failure to explain his actions during the time of the murder.
In a murder conviction based on circumstantial evidence, multiple corroborative factors, including the last seen theory and absence of alternative explanations, can establish guilt beyond reasonable ....
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence leading to the only conclusion of guilt for a conviction to be sustainable.
The conviction for murder was upheld based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence, establishing the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
In circumstantial murder cases, last seen theory alone cannot sustain conviction without complete evidentiary chain excluding innocence, especially with wide time gap allowing third-party interventio....
The judgment establishes the principle that circumstantial evidence, when corroborated and supported by motive, can be sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
