ALOK ARADHE, J. SREENIVAS RAO
Union of India, rep. by Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Roshan Minoo Patel, W/o. Minoo Sorabji Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J. Sreenivas Rao, J.
Heard Sri B.Narsimha Sarma, learned Additional Solicitor General of India representing Sri T.Srujan Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri E.Madam Mohan Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri M.Srinivas, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. The appellants have filed this writ appeal aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.14347 of 2002, dated 22.07.2011.
3. For the sake of convenience the parties herein will be referred to as they are arrayed in the impugned order dated 22.07.2011.
4. Brief facts of the case:
4.1 Bungalow No.176 in land admeasuring Acs.2.6224 bounded by a compound wall situated at Bowenpally, Secunderabad originally belonged to one Mirza Parvarish Ali who sold the said land in favour of B.D.Chenoy through registered sale deed dated 18.08.1905. After the death of B.D.Chenoy, his wife Smt. Avabai Chenoy also died and the petitioners who are the children of B.D.Chenoy inherited the said property and the petitioners are in exclusive possession of the subject property and the Government never raised any objection in respect of the subject property and the petitioners have filed de
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Thummala Krishna Rao and another and batch AIR 1982 SC 1081
Summary eviction proceedings cannot proceed when there is a bona fide dispute regarding property title; such disputes must be resolved in a competent Civil Court.
Summary eviction under Public Premises Act, 1971 inapplicable to bona fide title disputes; must be resolved in civil courts. GLR entries lack presumptive value without notice and hearing.
The executing court cannot go beyond the decree and must respect prior adjudications regarding entitlement to compensation, as established by the doctrine of merger.
Adverse possession claims over government land require substantial evidence; mere long-standing possession does not confer title, particularly where public interest is involved.
Civil courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate title disputes over land; revenue authorities cannot evict occupants under disputed ownership.
Acquisition of land – Only a person interested can challenge judgment and award passed by Reference Court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.