IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G. Radha Rani, J.
Goda Krishna – Petitioner
Versus
Pidiseti Vasantha Kumar – Respondent
Appeal Suit No.57 of 2024
Decided On : 06-09-2024
(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order VII Rule 11 – Limitation Act, 1963 – Suit for declaration of title and cancellation of sale deeds – Plaintiff, an NRI, claimed ownership of property based on a registered sale deed from 1982 – Defendants executed subsequent sale deeds claiming title – Trial court found plaintiff's title valid and decreed suit – Appeal dismissed, confirming trial court's findings. (Paras 9, 10, 34, 35)
(B) Power of Attorney – Competency of GPA holder to testify – Court upheld that a GPA holder can give evidence on behalf of the principal if they have personal knowledge of the transaction – The trial court's reliance on GPA holder's testimony was justified. (Paras 15, 20, 22)
(C) Minor's capacity to contract – Court ruled that while a minor cannot enter into a contract, they can still be a transferee of property – Sale deed executed in favor of a minor is valid and enforceable. (Paras 24, 28, 29)
Facts of the case: The plaintiff purchased property in 1982 and later discovered fraudulent sale deeds executed by defendants claiming ownership. The trial court found the plaintiff's title valid and decreed the suit in his favor. (Paras 3, 4, 9)
Findings of Court: The trial court held that the plaintiff proved his title and was entitled to recover possession of the property, dismissing the defendants' claims as fraudulent. (Paras 9, 10)
Issues: The main issues included the validity of the sale deeds executed by defendants, the plaintiff's ownership, and the applicability of limitation laws. (Paras 7, 34)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the plaintiff's title was established through valid documentation, and the defendants' claims were based on fraudulent documents. The limitation period commenced from the plaintiff's knowledge of dispossession in 2019. (Paras 9, 34)
Result: Appeal dismissed, confirming the trial court's judgment. (Paras 35)
JUDGMENT :
G. Radha Rani, J.
This appeal is filed by the appellant – defendant No.6 aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 06.11.2023 passed in O.S.No.783 of 2019 by the Principal District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.
2. The respondent No.1 is the plaintiff.
3. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of title over the suit schedule property and for cancellation of registered sale deed document No.10178 of 2018 dated 24.10.2018 executed between defendants 1 and 2 and to cancel the registered sale deed document No.3612 of 2019 dated 04.04.2019 executed between defendants 2 and 6 by declaring the same as null and void and not binding on him and for recovery of possession of the suit schedule property by awarding costs of the suit.
4. The plaintiff stated that he purchased a plot bearing No.165 admeasuring 267 square yards equivalent to 223.3 square meters situated in Survey Nos.48 and 49, Bandlaguda Village, Rajendranagar Taluk, Rangareddy District by virtue of a registered sale deed document No.614 of 1982 registered in the office of the Joint Sub-Registrar-I, RO, Rangareddy District on 21.01.1982. The plaintiff purchased the same after verifying the layout of defendant No.3. The defendants 3 and 4 delivered the physical and actual possession and from the date of registration, the plaintiff had been in continuous possession. It was an open plot. The plaintiff was a resident of Australia and a Non-Resident Indian (for short “NRI”). Whenever he visited Hyderabad, he used to visit the suit schedule property. On 16.02.2019, when he visited the suit schedule property, he found that someone had dug a trench around the property. The plaintiff obtained Encumbrance Certificate (for short “EC”) from the Joint SubRegistrar-II, Rangareddy District and found that there was Nil Encumbrance. The plaintiff found that there were no encumbrances for the period from 01.01.1980 to 31.12.1982 except showing the names of defendant No.3 and the plaintiff. He went to the office of the Sub-Registrar, Rajendra Nagar and found Nil Encumbrance. Then, he obtained Encumbrance Certificate from the SubRegistrar, Gandipet and found that a sale transaction took place between defendants 1 and 2 in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Gandipet. Therefore, the plaintiff obtained a certified copy of the registered sale deed document No.10178 of 2018 dated 24.10.2018 and found that it was appearing on the face of the said document that it was forged and created with a malafide intention to knock away the suit schedule property since the plaintiff was an NRI. Hence, the said registered sale deed was liable to be cancelled and prayed to declare his title over the suit schedule property.
4.1. The plaintiff further contended that the defendant No.5 had misused the power in registering the plot on presenting the document by defendants 1 and 2 without perusing the link documents. Taking advantage of his NRI status, the said document was created / fabricated by defendants 1 and 2 in collusion with defendant No.5 to knock away the property. As such, he gave a General Power of Attorney (for short “GPA”) in favor of his brother Sri P.Vinod Kumar to act on his behalf and requested his advocate to issue a legal notice to all the defendants. The plaintiff got issued a legal notice dated 02.03.2019 to all the defendants to take necessary steps to cancel the registered sale deed document No.10178 of 2018 dated 24.10.2018 with immediate effect. The legal notices sent by the plaintiff’s counsel to the defendants 1 to 5 were received by them. But they did not choose to give reply, hence, filed the suit.
4.2. The plaintiff further submitted that on filing I.A.No.90 of 2020 by defendant No.6, he came to know that the defendant No.6 had purchased land bearing Plot No.165 in Survey Nos.48 and 49 admeasuring 267 square yards situated at Bandlaguda Jagir Village and Gram Panchayat, Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District. In the sale deed document No.10178 of 2018 dated 24
A.C Narayan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and another v. Indusind Bank Limited and Others (2005) 2 SCC 217
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani vs. IndusInd Bank Ltd. (2005) 2 SCC 217
K.Bharathi v. Labor Officer 1999 (3) ALT 428
Ma Hnit and Others v. Hasim Ebrahim Meter and another AIR 1919 PC 129
Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Defence
Union of India v. Vasavi Cooperative Housing Society Limited and Others
A minor can be a transferee of property, and a sale deed executed in their favor is valid despite their incapacity to contract.
In a suit for declaration of title, the burden lies on the plaintiff to establish their title, and failure to do so results in dismissal, regardless of the defendants' claims.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely and proper legal action, and the need for plaintiffs to make clear and consistent pleadings to support their claims.
Presumption that possession goes with title applies to a case like this where neither party has been able to prove or establish possession, but one of the parties is able to show its title.
A power of attorney is not compulsorily registerable under the Registration Act for the purpose of presenting a deed of sale; furthermore, a suit for declaration against such transactions is subject ....
The court found the trial court erred in rejecting the plaint, emphasizing the need for a full examination of the ownership claims rather than dismissing based on presumptive documents.
A suit for declaration of ownership is barred by limitation when filed more than three years after the cause of action arises, particularly if adverse legal actions are not promptly contested.
(1) Power-of-attorney holder cannot depose for Principal in respect of a matter regarding which only Principal can have personal knowledge and incurs liability to be cross-examined.(2) Pleadings cann....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.