ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
Kamlesh Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
Vibha Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant – defendant calling in question the judgment and decree dated 24-04-2018 passed by the Xth Additional District Judge, Bhopal (MP) in Regular Civil Appeal No.93/2016 reversing the judgment and decree dated 25-02-2016 passed by VIth Civil Judge Class-I, Bhopal (MP) in Civil Suit No.712-A/2011.
2. The facts of the case, succinctly stated are that the respondent - plaintiff through her power of attorney holder filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction and also for getting vacant possession by demolishing the construction made over the disputed plot against the appellant – defendant inter-alia contending that the respondent – plaintiff was the owner and title holder of the suit property bearing khasra no.236/268/236, area 1800 Sq. ft. situated at Plot no.13, in village Semra Kalan, Ashoka Garden, Bhopal. She purchased the said plot from one Manohar Lal Babbar through registered sale deed dated 30.11.1968 and she had transferred all her rights with regard to disputed plot to one Purshottam Raghuwanshi, through power of attorney dated 8.12.2011 and a copy whereof
Iqbal Basith and Ors. vs. N. Subbalakshmi and Ors.
Gulla Kharagit Carpenter vs. Harsingh Nandkishore Rawat
S. Kesari Hanuman Goud vs. Anjum Jehan and Ors.
Vidhyadhar vs. Manikrao and Anr.
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani vs. Indusind Bank Ltd.
M/s Shankar Finance and Investment vs. State of A.P. and Ors.
Man Kaur vs. Hartar Singh Sangha
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and Anr. vs. Indus Ind Bank Ltd and Ors.
Awadh Bihari Asati and Ors. v. Shyam Bihari Asati and Ors.
Moolchand vs. Radha Sharan and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.