SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA
Kamlesh Kushwaha – Appellant
Versus
Vibha Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri Sachin Kumar Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Piyush Bhatnagar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

This appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant – defendant calling in question the judgment and decree dated 24-04-2018 passed by the Xth Additional District Judge, Bhopal (MP) in Regular Civil Appeal No.93/2016 reversing the judgment and decree dated 25-02-2016 passed by VIth Civil Judge Class-I, Bhopal (MP) in Civil Suit No.712-A/2011.

2. The facts of the case, succinctly stated are that the respondent - plaintiff through her power of attorney holder filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction and also for getting vacant possession by demolishing the construction made over the disputed plot against the appellant – defendant inter-alia contending that the respondent – plaintiff was the owner and title holder of the suit property bearing khasra no.236/268/236, area 1800 Sq. ft. situated at Plot no.13, in village Semra Kalan, Ashoka Garden, Bhopal. She purchased the said plot from one Manohar Lal Babbar through registered sale deed dated 30.11.1968 and she had transferred all her rights with regard to disputed plot to one Purshottam Raghuwanshi, through power of attorney dated 8.12.2011 and a copy whereof

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top