ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Dornala Malla Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Special Deputy Collector/LAO – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J.
1. Heard Sri A. Krupadhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants-claimants and learned Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the respondent-Land Acquisition Officer.
2. This appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) is filed by the claimants challenging the order and decree dated 28.07.2010 passed in L.A.O.P. No. 2 of 2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sircilla (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Reference Court’).
3. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that the lands to an extent of Acs. 6.30 guntas situated in Gangadhara Village, Karimnagar District, belonging to the appellants-claimants, were acquired for formation of new broad gauge single Railway line from Karimnagar to Jagtial passing through under the limits of Gangadhara Village; that draft Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published in Gazette on 08.07.2002; that possession of the acquired lands was taken on 07.11.2002; and that the Land Acquisition Officer, after conducting award enquiry, passed Award No. 6 of 2004, dated 15.03.2005, fixing the market value of the acquired lands @ Rs.60,000/- per acre, for both w
Administrator General of West Bengal vs. Collector, Varanasi
Tejumal Bhojwani (Dead) through LRs. and Others vs. State of U.P. (2003) 10 SCC 525
The Land Acquisition Officer, Sub Collector, Vijayawada vs. Shaik Bhaileem and Others
Claimants are entitled to separate compensation for land and structures when capitalization is not applied, ensuring just compensation under the Land Acquisition Act.
The highest prevailing market value should be used to determine compensation for acquired lands, rejecting undervalued assessments by the Land Acquisition Officer.
The court upheld the market value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer, affirming that the Reference Court properly evaluated the evidence and did not err in its decision.
Compensation for acquired land must be determined by comparable market transactions reflecting true market value, incorporating both land and significant improvements like irrigation wells.
The court upheld the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation for acquired lands, affirming the reliance on sale deeds and evidence as just and reasonable.
Compensation for acquired land must be based on adequate evidence and comparable sales, with specific regard to the land's use and potential value, while claims for enhancements must be substantiated....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.