Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
M. Panduranga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
N. Narsamma – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the propriety and legality of the docket order dated 26.06.2023 in O.S. No. 53 of 2017 passed by the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad whereby and whereunder it was held by the trial Court that the unregistered Agreement of Sale dated 25.01.2000 is inadmissible in evidence and accordingly the objection raised by the plaintiff was sustained.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit before the trial Court.
3. The plaintiff filed the suit against the defendant for declaration of her title for the suit property, for the eviction of the defendant and for a decree for correction in the house tax Revision Register of the Grampanchayat at Rajole for the year 1998-1999, by incorporating her name as owner of the suit property after deleting the name of the plaintiff in respect thereof.
4. As can be seen from the plaint, the case of the plaintiff in brief is that one Narayana Rao, was the owner and possessor of the house bearing No. 3-106, admeasuring 507.65 sq. yards situated in Rajole Village. In the year 1987, the plaintiff purchased the western portion of the said house which
Unregistered agreements of sale are inadmissible in evidence for suits requiring registration under the Indian Registration Act, as their nature is determined by recitals, not nomenclature.
An unregistered Sale deed may be admissible for collateral purposes if proper procedures, including stamp duty payment, are followed, according to Section 49 of the Indian Registration Act.
Unregistered agreements may be admissible in specific performance suits, and the absence of possession transfer does not bar such documentation under the Registration Act.
An unregistered sale deed cannot be admitted as evidence for ownership in a declaration suit, violating statutory provisions of the Registration Act and Transfer of Property Act.
Unregistered sale deeds are inadmissible as evidence in property transactions requiring registration; compliance with registration is necessary for evidential validity.
A Sale Deed must be registered to be admissible in evidence, regardless of its historical context or the law in force at the time of execution.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that unregistered and insufficiently stamped documents, even if not covered by specific consequences of non-registration, are inadmissible in ev....
An unregistered document can be received in evidence for collateral purposes, such as proving possession of the property, under the proviso to Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908, provided that ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
