IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
M/s. Laxmi Sai Breeding Farms Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Telangana & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No.2369 Of 2019
Decided On : 21-12-2023
ORDER :
(Surepalli Nanda, J.)
Heard the learned counsel Mr.L.Preetham Reddy, appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 and learned Counsel Mr. Bobbili Srinivas, on behalf of Respondent No.5.
2. PRAYER :
Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :
3. Case of the Petitioner as per the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present writ petition in brief are as under:
The Petitioner is a Company under the style of M/s.Laxmi Sai Breeding Farms Private Limited, resident of Villa No.56, Mytri Enclave, Yapral, Secunderabad. The Petitioner herein had purchased land admeasuring Ac.120.00 under Registered Sale Deeds dated 29.10.1986 bearing Document No.200 to 205 of 1987 on the file of Sub-Registrar, Narsapur, from the original owners and obtained pattadar passbooks and title deeds bearing Patta No.112 and also got mutated their names in the Revenue Records under the provisions of A.P. Rights in Lands & Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971. The Petitioner herein filed an application on 13.10.1987 seeking exemption U/s.18(2) of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 for Poultry Development. The 2nd Respondent through its letter dated 02.11.1987 recommended the same to the Government through the Commissioner of Land Reforms and Urban Land Ceiling for grant of permission and the Government duly considering the same issued G.O.Ms.No.1166, Revenue Department, dated 28.11.1989 granting exemption to M/s. Basic Breeders Pvt., Ltd., in respect of land admeasuring Ac.206.00 in Sy.No.92, 93, 93/2 and 94 of Nagasanpally Village, Kowdipally Mandal, exempting the said land from the provisions of the Act. The Petitioner herein commenced the Poultry Breeding and Hatchery and obtained Power Release Certificate on 28.01.1989 and thereafter obtained Registration Certificate as a Small Scale Industrial Unit from the Department of Industries, Government of Andhra Pradesh on 17.04.1989. Petitioner also obtained recognition certificate on 22.08.1990 and established Poultry business by constructing sheds and other dwelling units.
It is further the case of the Petitioner that M/s. Basic Breeders Limited Company subsequently changed its name as M/s. Indian Poultry Private Limited and M/s. Indian Poultry Private Limited executed Sale Deed bearing Doc.No.980/2008, dated 11.02.2008 in favour of G.V. Aswin, S/o. G.V. Narappa Reddy for an extent of Ac.36.00 in Sy.No.92 of Nagasanpally Village from out of the said land and after the said purchase G.V. Aswin, applied for and obtained mutation proceedings No.C/371/2008, dated 25.02.2008 on the file of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Kowdipally and also obtained pattadar passbook and title deed bearing Patta No.175 under the Provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act No.26 of 1971 and thereafter applied for and obtained permission for construction of Poultry Shed and quarters in the said land from the Gram Panchayat, Thimmapur, Kowdipally Mandal, on 12.03.2008 by paying necessary amount of Rs.13,240/- through Challan dated 13.06.2008 and further the said G.V. Aswin alienated an extent of Ac.16.00 and also an extent of Ac.20.00 (in all Ac.36.00) under two Registered Sale Deeds bearing Doc.Nos.3812/2010 and 3813/2010 both dated 11.10.2010 in favour of the Petitioner her
The exercise of revisional power under the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act after a significant delay is improper and violates principles of natural justice.
The court ruled that delayed administrative actions undermining property rights must be resolved through civil courts, emphasizing the importance of timely legal recourse.
The court affirmed that a revision petition under the ROR Act can be filed without a time limit, emphasizing the need for a fresh enquiry into land ownership claims, especially in cases of alleged fr....
Point of law: Any person aggrieved by any order made by the State Government or other authority in exercise of the powers conferred on it by the Act or these rules may, within three months of the dat....
Claims for land ownership after significant delays must be addressed by civil courts, as administrative bodies cannot adjudicate on disputed titles without violating established rights.
The scope of judicial review is confined to decision making process and not the decision per se.
The main legal point established is the requirement of notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing orders under Sec.5(3) of the A.P. Record of Rights in Land and Pattedar Passb....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.