SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Telangana) 619

P. SREE SUDHA
M. Subash Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vidyasagar S. Nitha – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri M.Yadagiri
For the Respondent: Sri M.V.S.Sai Kumar

JUDGMENT :

This appeal suit is filed against the Judgment and decree dated 25.11.2009 in O.S.No.37 of 2003, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad.

2. The suit vide O.S.No.37 of 2003, was filed by appellant/plaintiff against respondent/defendant for specific performance of Agreement of Sale dated 24.09.2002. The trial Court examined P.Ws.1 to 3 and marked Exs.A1 to A5 on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff. There is no evidence on behalf of the respondent/defendant, but got marked Ex.B1 copy of the Judgment in O.S.No.310 of 2006, on behalf of the defendant. The trial Court after considering the arguments of both sides and evidence on record, decreed the suit to the extent of return of amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with interest @ 6% per annum from 24.09.2002 to till date without costs and respondent/defendant was directed to deposit the amount within two months, failing which, he was directed to pay interest @ 18% per annum. Aggrieved by the said Judgment and decree, plaintiff therein preferred the present appeal.

3. The learned Counsel for the appellant/plaintiff mainly contended that respondent/defendant is the owner of the land measuring Acs.5 – 04 gts in Sy.No.280 and land ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top