Back
J. SREENIVAS RAO
Potla Venkata Prasad, S/o Chinna Gopaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
2. Heard Mr.Kowturu Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri G.Ravi Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.4 and 6.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is the owner and possessor of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.2.20 gts in Sy.No.274/2, situated at Pedda Mandava Village, Mudigonda Mandal, Karimnagar District and the same was acquired through agreement of sale dated 27.09.2010, executed by respondent No.5, by receiving valuable sale consideration and since then he has been in possession and enjoyment of the said property. He further submits that the Village Revenue Officer after following procedure incorporated the name of the petitioner in possession column i.e., Column No.1
The court upheld the principle of natural justice, ruling that revenue entries made without notice to affected parties are invalid.
The court ruled that orders affecting rights must not be made without providing notice and opportunity to the affected party, emphasizing the principles of natural justice.
The court emphasized the necessity of following procedural requirements and the principle of natural justice in amending entries in the Record of Rights, ruling that the respondent acted without juri....
Point of law: The demand for justice is not a matter of form but a matter of substance, and it is necessary that a “proper and sufficient demand has to be made”. The demand must be made to the proper....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
