Back
M. G. PRIYADARSINI
Goel Road Carriers, Hyd. – Appellant
Versus
Tecumseh Products India Ltd. , – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.G.Priyadarsini, J.
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 37(1)(B) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (for short ‘the Act’) by appellant aggrieved by the Order dated 04.03.2011 in Arbitration Original Petition No.2171 of 2005 (impugned Order) passed by the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad (for short ‘learned Chief Judge’) wherein application filed by M/s.Goel Carriers (hereinafter referred as ‘respondent’) against claimant, to set aside Award dated 17.02.2005 passed by learned Sole Arbitrator-respondent No.2 herein, was dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred as per their array before the learned Sole Arbitrator.
3. Claimant entered an Agreement dated 16.01.2001 with respondent for transportation of consignments such as hermetically sealed compressors and other ancillary parts from Hyderabad to Delhi, Noida and other places. Some consignments transported during January, May, June and August, 2001 were damaged due to accidents. Claimant incurred Rs.29,01,021/- for repairing the damaged compressors. Respondent withheld consignments worth of Rs.10,76,685/- towards freight charges. Therefore, di
The court upheld the validity of the arbitral award, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial interference and the necessity of demonstrating clear error or illegality.
The court upheld the arbitrator's award, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial interference in arbitration matters.
The limited scope of intervention by Courts in arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the need to satisfy specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral....
The court reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review of arbitral awards under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing that courts cannot reappraise evidence or in....
The arbitration agreement's validity is independent of stamp duty on the substantive contract, and courts have limited grounds for interfering with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration....
The arbitration agreement's validity is independent of stamp duty issues, and courts have limited grounds for interfering with arbitral awards.
The arbitration agreement's validity is independent of stamp duty on the substantive contract, and courts have limited grounds for interfering with arbitral awards.
The court affirmed that limited judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not allow for re-evaluation of arbitration awards unless they are demonstrably perverse, illegal, or devoi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
