Back
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, M. G. PRIYADARSINI
Sharada Devi Kedia – Appellant
Versus
Kisna Avenues Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
The Civil Revision Petition arises out of an impugned docket order passed by the Trial Court on 03.04.2024 on an application filed by the petitioners herein for impleading certain parties as respondents in the Arbitration Original Petition (ARB.O.P.No.13 of 2023).
2. The impugned order however discusses the nature of the dispute between the petitioners (also petitioners in the Trial Court) and the respondents and concludes that the dispute between the parties is not a commercial dispute and the Court accordingly has jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
3. We should clarify that the parties in the Civil Revision Petition have argued on the nature of the dispute, that is, whether the dispute is a “Commercial Dispute” as defined under the provisions of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and whether the Trial Court, not being a designated Commercial Court, had the jurisdiction to entertain the petitioners' application for addition of parties. In essence, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners argues that the learned Ist Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, did not have jurisdiction to entertain the petition since it is not
A commercial dispute must have implications beyond the contracting parties, and not every construction agreement qualifies as such.
Commercial disputes under Section 2(1)(c)(vi) of the Commercial Courts Act must pertain to agreements that exhibit commercial characteristics beyond private contracts, requiring strict interpretation....
Disputes regarding construction agreements are classified as commercial under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, provided the specified value exceeds Rs. 1 crore.
Disputes arising from construction and infrastructure contracts are considered commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, thereby granting jurisdiction to commercial courts to adjudic....
The court reaffirmed that disputes involving contracts for construction and development, such as the MOU in question, fall within the jurisdiction of commercial courts under the Commercial Courts Act....
Point of law: Section 2(1)(c) of Act, 2015 defines what is meant by ‘commercial dispute’ and instances are mentioned in various clauses incorporated therein. ‘Commercial dispute’ means a dispute aris....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of what constitutes a 'commercial dispute' under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and the application of relevant clauses to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
